Wednesday, April 29, 2009

Dear Arthur Seaton: Here's Another Example For You, You Lying Sack Of [Redacted]

Here's another nail in the coffin for your constant claims that nothing needs to be done to improve the way forensic evidence is used in criminal trials.


Anonymous said...

Another "gem" for the "best" DA's office in the country.

Anonymous said...

This one dates back to '87? Just how many wrongful convictions are there likely to be if they didn't even yhink there was a problem until a few years ago?

Rage Judicata said...

Good question 10:57. Too bad we'll never know the answer, in part because many of the people in charge deny it's a problem at all, or worse yet, know it is but just don't care.